From ‘Form 47’ to ‘Federation’
Any changes to the 18th Amendment would seriously violate the foundational principles of the Federal system as outlined in the 1973 Constitution
Read moreAny changes to the 18th Amendment would seriously violate the foundational principles of the Federal system as outlined in the 1973 Constitution
Read moreInstead of just minor legislative tweaks, Pakistan truly needs significant, meaningful changes to its Constitution that can make a real difference
Read moreMature democracies successfully strike a balance between governance and popularity, but unfortunately, Pakistan has struggled to do so
Read moreIf the 28th Amendment passes, the country will lose whatever remains of decentralisation, which forms the building block of a federation
Read moreFollowing the enactment of the 26th and 27th Amendments, the proposed 28th Amendment would further restrict civilian authority
Read moreThe UAE’s decision to leave OPEC highlights a growing rift between the UAE and Saudi Arabia and signals a drastic move away from the system shaped by Saudi Arabia
Read moreThe ongoing rivalry between the United States and Iran has brought about increased political, economic, and strategic challenges throughout the Middle East
Read moreWhat is emerging instead is a harsher reality: a Middle East defined less by shared Arab identity than by logistics corridors, transactional alliances, and overlapping cold wars
Read moreIn marked contrast to November of 2022, today’s Pakistan has evolved as an international peace headquarters, thanks to the rise and rise of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Syed Asim Munir
Read moreThe transatlantic relationship, once the cornerstone of global order, is rapidly losing its centrality, giving way to a more fractured, post-American, multi-bloc world
Read moreSooner or later, Pakistan may need to reevaluate the merits and drawbacks of persisting with its mediation efforts, considering U.S. President Donald Trump’s tendency to attribute his shortcomings to others
Read moreThe persistent stalemate between Iran and the United States exemplifies how U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tend to overestimate their capabilities while underestimating the strength and resilience of their adversaries
Read moreIt would be a remarkable achievement if, after nearly five decades of hostility, Iran and the United States succeeded in reconciling their differences
Read morePakistan has to look within amidst a multitude of internal pressures and the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran
Read moreThere are several reasons to believe that Pakistan cannot be subjected to targeting similar to Iran based on a perceived nuclear threat
Read moreIn the event of Iran’s collapse, Israel, India, and the United States may perceive an opportunity to target Pakistan with the objective of dismantling its nuclear assets and missile programs
Read moreAll the initial signs emanating from Dhaka in the glow of the big win herald hope for a constructive use of the strong mandate
Read moreThe BNP government faces an uphill task of establishing democracy in its true meaning
Read moreRelations between Bangladesh and Pakistan will improve under the BNP’s rule, but expecting Dhaka and Islamabad to mend their fences completely is unrealistic
Read moreThe old post-1945, U.S.-led order is eroding, and multiple visions of a new order are competing, without a single clear successor, increasing uncertainty and strategic competition
Read moreIf the unpredictable policies of U.S. President Donald Trump continue, Asia will certainly strengthen its position in global affairs
Read moreUS President Donald Trump’s dictatorial ways have changed the ways of global diplomacy
Read moreAsia is under the dangerous illusion of distance that it can remain an observer rather than a participant in this unfolding disorder
Read more