Islamabad
Terms of Engagement
Has the US, under President Joe Biden, revisited its terms of engagement with Pakistan? The answer to this question is both ‘Yes’ and ‘No’.
Pakistan and the US celebrated 75 years of friendship last year, showing their depth and longevity despite ups and downs. Pakistan and the US share universal values of democracy, the rule of law, and upholding human rights. Since 2001, the U.S. policy has been aimed at encouraging the development of a more stable, democratic, and prosperous Pakistan that actively combats militancy and works together with the U.S. to eradicate terrorism from its land.
Since then, Pakistan has partnered with the U.S. in the War on Terror. However, this alliance cost Pakistan immensely due to formidable financial and human losses, reflecting the country’s firm resolve against terrorism. Besides Pakistan, no country has sacrificed so much in fighting terrorism, which is still taking place in some parts of the country, notably Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (PK).
Both states are actively engaged in eradicating militancy to establish a safe and secure region, but Pakistanis are getting targeted one way or the other. As seen from the angles of diplomacy and foreign policy, it is speculated that a change in leadership can affect the relationship between the two states, a reality which raises a thought-provoking question: Has the US, under President Joe Biden, revisited its terms of engagement with Pakistan? The answer to this question is both ‘Yes’ and ‘No’.
Historically speaking, U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower visited Pakistan in 1959, President Lyndon Baines Johnson in 1967, President Richard Milhous Nixon in 1969, President Bill Clinton in 2000, and President George W. Bush in 2006. Since then, not a single US President has visited Pakistan. On the other hand, from Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan to Prime Minister Imran Khan, almost every head of the state and prime minister of Pakistan paid a visit to the U.S., which shows Islamabad’s strong commitment to its bilateral relations with the U.S. Fighting Jihad against the Soviets in Afghanistan to acting as a non-NATO of the U.S. in its War on Terror, for decades Pakistan stood firmly with the U.S. at the cost of its people, peace and prosperity.
Since the withdrawal of the U.S. troops from Afghanistan, there has been some uncertainty and disquiet about the relevance and nature of the Pakistan-U.S. relationship. According to Ambassador Masood Khan, diplomacy has brought our engagement to an even keel, thus leading to public pronouncements by the leadership of the two countries that Pakistan-U.S. relations have been de-hyphenated. That means Pakistan-U.S. relations cannot be seen from the prism of Afghanistan and India. We have been assured that even China would not be a new hyphen. This seems to be a new prism in decades of Pakistan-U.S. relations, but will it be sustained considering the evolving geo-political and geo-economic situation?
Regarding collaboration, Pakistan and the U.S. have various security and non-security partnerships. In the security context, both countries have defence, military and intelligence-sharing ties; they conduct joint armed forces exercises and various training programmes, etc. Regarding non-security affairs, both countries collaborate in energy, trade and investment, education and healthcare, clean energy and combating the climate crisis, technology, Afghanistan stabilization, counterterrorism, and counter-piracy operations. We believe a harmonious strategic alignment will create a constructive environment for scaling up Pakistan-U.S. bilateral ties, especially in the economic, technological, and educational domains.
To fight the COVID-19 pandemic, the US delivered 79 million vaccine doses, making it the largest donor to Pakistan. Despite COVID-19 and other fluctuations, the US remains the largest export market for Pakistan. In 2021-22, our trade increased from $8.4 billion to $12 billion. Pakistan’s exports went up from $7 billion to $9 billion, of which IT exports were $1 billion. However, global technology investors and venture capitalists, mainly from the US, are taking the lead in unlocking new business ecosystems in Pakistan, especially in the tech sector. Thousands of successful start-ups have sprung up in the past two years. They thrive in fintech, e-commerce, health tech, agri-tech, retail, transportation, logistics, supply chains, construction, and real estate businesses.
The U.S. conglomerates and multinational corporations have done good business in Pakistan for decades. These include top brands like Procter & Gamble, Abbot, Cargill, Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and others. Altogether, eighty American enterprises give jobs to nearly 150,000 people and sustain more than a million households. In Pakistan-U.S. relations, the contribution of the almost one million-strong Pakistani-American community has become a rock-hard bridge between the two countries. Many of them, who have excelled in the US, are investing in businesses and carving new keystones for our connectivity. To prepare them for the markets, we have to work on the quality and training of the 300,000 students, including an increasing number of women who graduate yearly from some 200 universities. Establishing Lincoln Corners in Pakistani Universities is a good starting point. Let’s have Pakistan Chairs in American Universities too.
Pakistan emits less than 0.4 percent of global greenhouse gasses, yet it is the eighth most vulnerable country to climate change. Pakistan appreciated the U.S. recent initiative announced by Ambassador Donald Blome in Islamabad to launch a Green Alliance. High-level visits and communication have given a fresh impetus to Islamabad’s endeavours to recalibrate, reenergize, and rejuvenate a broad-based relationship. It would be a practical, pragmatic, and realistic correlative without a mismatch of expectations.
Regarding public sentiments, firstly, as Pakistanis, we feel that the U.S., a long-time friend of Pakistan, seldom acknowledged our contribution (financial and human loss) to the War on Terror. Hence, acknowledging the Pakistani government and its people’s contribution to the War on Terror would have strengthened Islamabad’s stance on eradicating the militancy in the region and beyond. Secondly, the people of Pakistan expected U.S. support in easing the IMF conditions during the programme period. The country’s leading economists believe that the last and current IMF programme is the harshest ever given to any developing country such as Pakistan. The people of Pakistan also expect a long-time cordial friend to help Pakistan during the worst financial time in the history of Pakistan. Standing by Pakistan during the IMF programme would have set a clear precedent for struggling economies to count on the world’s most powerful country in times of crisis!
The writer is associated with the National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad as an Assistant Professor at Department of Government and Public Policy. She can be reached at farahnaz@s3h.nust.edu.pk
Khalid Ahmed Brings Back Memories of Zia Mohyeddin
HBL and J.P. Morgan Enter into an Agreement
India arrests top Vivo executives
NBP announces pilot launch of ‘Digital Account Opening’
Khaleda Zia at ‘high risk of death’
RSF condemns detention of Kashmiri journalist
Cricket set for shot at Olympic glory
Frank Sinatra in Karachi
Maldives’ new president wants Indian troops out of country
Arundhati Roy faces prosecution
Pakistan makes history at 2026 FIFA WC qualifiers
South Asia, the world’s most disconnected region
X social media to test $1 annual subscription
Nutshell turns 20
Bombay court rejects petition to ban Pakistani Artistes
PIA switches to plan B
Leave a Reply