International
Erdogan Again!
Civilian supremacy in Türkiye is not a myth but an undeniable reality. In marked contrast, Pakistan is still grappling with large scale interference of non-political forces in governance and political affairs.
When on May 28, 2023, Recep Tayyip Erdogan was re-elected as President of Türkiye in run-off elections, one can expect a great leap forward in terms of that country’s standing in the world affairs. Türkiye has given Erdogan 25 years to govern the country, which led to enormous transformation in economic and political terms. Erdogan has managed to pull his country out of economic crisis and put Türkiye on the road to stable democracy by cutting the influence of the military forces.
Erdogan’s journey to power began in 1994 when he became mayor of Türkiye’s largest city Istanbul. But, in view of his independent and Islamic mindset, which was unacceptable to powerful military, he was disqualified to contest elections after four years when he read a poem written in 1920. That poem was perceived to be that of a voice of an Islamist movement and a challenge to Türkiye’s secular order. In 2001, he played a role to establish Justice and Development Party (AKP) which won elections in 2003. Abdullah Gul who became president removed ban on Erdogan which enabled him to contest elections in 2007 and since then he is in power first as prime minister and then as president. Perceived to be Islamist in his thinking and approach, Erdogan proceeded with his two-pronged plan: first, to focus on development and giving a boost to economy and second to strengthen democracy by mitigating the influence of military.
In view of his better performance and popular support, he was able to crush 2016 attempted coup having the covert support of military. After the failed coup, Erdogan further liquidated the influence of military which for decades had ruled Türkiye and got a constitutional cover for a role in statecraft. The pathetic nature of Türkiye’s economy was evident from the fact that in 2003 the value of Turkish lira vis-à-vis U.S dollar was 15 million. After almost two decades of his hard work, Türkiye emerged as the world’s 19th largest economy with GDP of around $1 trillion, exports of $250 million and foreign exchange reserves of $60 billion. The value of lira versus U.S $ decline to 20. Recent earthquake in Türkiye negatively impacted the country’s foreign exchange reserves and economic growth rate, however, Erdogan managed to cope with that national disaster with the support of his people.
Türkiye is a member of NATO but its defiance against the United States on various policy issues is noticeable. Erdogan coped with pressures exerted by the U.S and some NATO member countries on siding with Ukraine over Russia. The level of confidence prevailing in Türkiye’s leadership is growing with each passing day because of support rendered by the majority of people to Erdogan and the level of patriotism, which was reflected in recent deadly earthquake. Will Erdogan transform Türkiye as an economic powerhouse of Europe and the world, and to what extent he will be able to use the time of his presidency in playing a leadership role in the Muslim world? What will be the implications of Erdogan’s electoral triumph in recently held presidential elections and what lessons one can learn from the success story of Türkiye?
There are voices expressing their criticism against Erdogan that he wants to transform Türkiye as his personal fiefdom and diminish the country’s secular credentials by giving space to Islamists. The fact that he failed to secure victory in the first round of presidential elections and had to go for a run-off reflects that almost 50% of people of Türkiye are opposed to him.
According to an article entitled, “Erdogan won by exploiting fear” written by Gonul Tol and published in My 31, 2023 issue of Foreign Policy, the writer argues that, “Conditions in Turkey were ripe for change, too. Corruption under Erdogan had reached astronomical proportions. His mishandling of the economy and dogged pursuit of “unorthodox” monetary policy had led to triple-digit inflation and left the central bank with negative foreign reserves. Devastating earthquakes had hit the country in early February, and the government’s slow response increased the death toll to more than 50,000. Popular demand for change had never been stronger. Yet those promising that change lost.”
He further states that, “Part of the answer lies in the nature of elections in autocracies. They are not free or fair. In Erdogan’s Turkey, the playing field is heavily skewed against the opposition. Erdogan either jailed or intimidated his most popular opponents with court cases. He used state resources and control of the media to appeal to voters while his opponent’s attempts to get his message across were constantly hindered”.
If Erdogan managed to win elections by securing 52% votes unlike 49% in the first round, it means he should be mindful of strong opposition which will make sure that he is not re-elected in next presidential elections. Yet, one can learn four lessons from Erdogan’s Pyrrhic victory.
First, despite his popularity at the grassroots level since he entered politics in 1994 and became mayor of Istanbul till today, Erdogan faced numerous challenges from his opponents, particularly those who alleged that he patronized corruption and nepotism and failed to effectively deal with the aftershocks of earthquake. Yet, he tried to deal with such criticism by focusing on economy, modernization of infrastructure and neutralizing military’s influence in governance. As a civilian ‘autocrat’ he sustained his efforts for development through a policy of ‘constructive engagement’ of youths.
One cannot take for granted holding of power forever but when their rise is a reflection of either their charisma or performance, the decline is also natural and it is prudent on the part of such leaders to call it a day before they are thrown out of power in an un-ceremonial manner. The examples of Nelson Mandela of South Africa, Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore and Julius Navarra of Tanzania of not sticking to power despite their better performance must be taken seriously by those who have power addiction and want to remain at the helm of affairs forever.
Erdogan is falling under that category as he now believes that he is invincible and will continue to win elections in the years to come. He should also learn from Mahathir Mohamad, former Prime Minister of Malaysia, who was a successful model of his country but lost elections which he contested at the age of 93. Second, the role of leadership in making or breaking a country cannot be denied. Pakistan disintegrated in 1971 because of irresponsible, incompetent, imprudent and corrupt leadership which looked the other way when the country was going down the drain. In post-1971 Pakistan, no lessons were learned and those who came to power failed to focus on economy, good governance, rule of law, accountability, better work ethics and other areas of human security.
Leadership qualities of Erdogan in ameliorating socio-economic conditions of people by focusing on development, good governance, modernization of infrastructure and education lifted his country from poverty, economic depression, underdevelopment, military’s rule and frustration among the youths. Resilience, vision, prudence, hard work, integrity, intelligence, consistency and planning are the fundamentals of leadership which the Türkiye’s president is trying to adhere to.
There cannot be a tangible comparison between Pakistan and Türkiye in terms of leadership, economy, governance and the rule of law, as deep respect at the international level of a country is earned because of vibrant economy, good governance, rule of law and accountability. Third, education, patriotism, efficiency together can be another lesson which Pakistan can learn from Türkiye. Till the time, Pakistan, a country of 240 million people, is disempowered as its youths who constitute 60% of population are frustrated from their present and future. China, Türkiye and India are the three model of success in economy which Pakistan must look into before it is too late and the country further plunges into the vicious cycle of economic, political and governance erosion.
Finally, Pakistan must learn lesson from the success of Türkiye’s model of democracy and cutting down military to size. There was a time few decades ago that in Pakistan there were people who used to urge that the country should follow the Turkish model of giving military a constitutional role in politics. Not anymore, because the credit to restrict military to its professional duties goes to Erdogan that he tactfully and shrewdly with popular support and economic development marginalized the role of non-political forces.
Civilian supremacy is Türkiye is not a myth but a reality. In marked contrast, Pakistan is still grappling with large scale interference of non-political forces in governance and politics. It means, unless feudal and tribal culture of Pakistan is mitigated and people are empowered, particularly the youth to have confidence on their own abilities instead of being dependent on foreign sources, the future of Pakistan will not be different from its past and present. Yet, in view of structural fault-lines in Pakistani culture, the country cannot learn lessons from the Türkiye’s model of success.
The writer is Meritorious Professor of International Relations and former Dean Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Karachi. He can be reached at moonis.ahmar59@gmail.com
Rehmat Ali Hasnie honoured as CEO of the year
Total PARCO organizes university day
Supreme Court rejects review plea in One Constitution Avenue case
Time for Animal Liberation
Islamic banks to encourage start-ups, generate jobs
‘I want to be healed,’ says model Saheefa Jabbar
India’s wrestling chief charged with harassment
HBL launch a customer care Twitter handle
Jubilee Life sends-off Pakistan’s contingent to Special Olympics
Pakistan Welcomes New British Envoys
Policy dialogue on Menstrual Health & Hygiene Tax Reforms held
Heart of Stone trailer is out
Xi, Blinken agree to Stabilize U.s.-China
India struggles with sweltering heat wave
Nepal bans Indian film
Naimal Khawar faces criticism for alleged plastic surgery
Son builds Taj Mahal for his mother
Naseeruddin shah apologies to Sindhi-speaking people
Leave a Reply