Cover Story
Weak Governance, Misdirected Priorities
This Pakistan government’s lack of direction and inconsistency has weakened democracy that was already very fragile.
The political leadership’s ideological orientation, commitment to democracy and the broad policies that it pursues determine the direction, and future stability of the state. This is particularly relevant for Pakistan, that was created as the homeland for Muslims of India in 1947. With the exception of Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Liaquat Ali Khan, successive leaders have failed to live up to the ideals of the founding fathers and have been unable to steer the country in the right direction. Expectations from Imran Khan were high but, regrettably, his weak governance and extremely harsh and intolerant attitude toward his political opponents, in sharp contrast to his soft and accommodative dealings with politico-militant religious groups, is leading the country towards instability. It gives an impression of obsequiousness. A recent example is when the Minister of Information categorically stated that the Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) would be banned, but soon the government retracted. This lack of direction and inconsistency has weakened democracy that was already very fragile. The military leadership too in the past has been using the TLP for building pressure on political parties and even the judiciary. A protest movement was staged against Justice Qazi Isa for his judgement in which he censored the TLP leadership that had the tacit support of the establishment. This was evident from the friendly way the group was given a send-off when they decided to call off the sit-in.
The TLP’s highly aggressive stance towards the state, and PM Khan taking a lenient view of their defiance with the establishment reconciling to it, has further emboldened them. The PM, by placing the blame on the previous government for not honouring its commitment with the TLP, has exonerated the group of any misconduct and shifted the entire burden for the present confrontation on the government policies of the past. Most surprising, PM Khan, in sharp contrast to his policy toward militant groups, has been consistently intolerant and offensive against his political opponents. He refuses to engage with them and goes to the extent of not even acknowledging their presence in the National Assembly and Senate. This obviously has consequences for a country that has a fragile democratic structure.

The policy of engaging with the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) by the government has also come under severe criticism. It is the same militant group that was responsible for the horrific cold-blooded murder of 150 persons, mostly young students of Army Public School, Peshawar. A major offensive was launched against them and the operation did succeed in wiping out their sanctuaries and, for a while, it seemed the threat had receded. It, however, did not take long for them to recoup their losses and they are now operating mostly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. The Taliban victory in Afghanistan has apparently been a morale booster. Giving them general amnesty on the understanding that they would not engage in any militant activity is doubtful, considering that the TTP has gone back on agreements at least five times in the past. Not taking the opposition and the parliament into confidence and working out a deal or an understanding with the TTP and TLP in disregard of accepted democratic norms, apart from the government’s leverage weakening, has marred political sentiment and set wrong traditions. Most troubling is the leniency and compromise that is being extended to pacify these violent groups, which stands in sharp contrast to the hard position taken by PM Khan against human rights groups and political opponents. Progressive movements that demand greater freedom of press and repeal of laws are being dealt severely. These contradictory policies would adversely impact the very character and nature of the state and have serious consequences for the economy, politics and image of the country. The weakness of the state would be capitalized by the TTP and TLP for gaining maximum concessions. Experience over the years demonstrates that those countries firmly rooted in democratic values are able to weed out militant groups far easily. Similarly, countries that have functional economies are in a better position to face militancy.
Moreover, with the Taliban assuming power in Afghanistan after a prolonged struggle spanning twenty years, the fallout on Pakistan and especially the border areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan has been destabilizing. The Taliban-led government of Afghanistan may be a welcome development, considering the hostility demonstrated by President Ashraf Ghani towards Pakistan but it has a serious dark side to it. The medieval thinking of the Taliban leadership, inability to govern satisfactorily and unacceptability by US and Western countries, has implications for Pakistan. Similarly, any dominance or growing influence of TLP and TTP in Pakistan would change the character and trajectory of the state adversely. These developments that affect the nature and character of the state should be a serious cause of concern across the political and social divide.
The writer is a retired lieutenant general of the Pakistan Army and a former federal secretary. He has also served as chairman of the Pakistan Ordnance Factories Board.
Leave a Reply