Beyond Survival
The 21st century has become blatantly anti-Muslim because the Muslims themselves have retracted into a corner and have allowed the West to take the initiative into its own hands.
During the last part of the 20th century, when digital communication was transforming the world into a web of human connections in the split of a second, debate focused on domestic politics, cold war between the US and the USSR and the dissolution of the latter. As hostilities between the world powers became diluted, a new global enemy took centre stage and all weapons were aimed at it. The event preceding this was 9/11, when deaths were caused by planes crashing into the twin towers of New York and the Pentagon building in Washington on September 11, 2001.
Almost two decades on, religious divisions, racism, extremist nationalism and Islamophobia is on the rise. Muslims face violations of their rights routinely, especially if they live in or travel to the West. They are often attacked in their places of worship and branded terrorists as a group. Many non-Muslims are wary of Muslims, making them targets of ridicule, abusing them or just ignoring them altogether. Accusations leveled against them include a perceived tendency to be violent towards non-Muslims; discrimination against women and human rights violations. They are also seen as being largely uneducated, uncouth and barbaric. Their actions are distorted, branded and communicated to the world through well-orchestrated propaganda by the West, while the latter’s own fanaticism is viewed as sporadic events.
Muslims, on the other hand, respond usually by arrogance; some still bask in dreams of historical glory; some wonder “what went wrong with us”; others insist that they are on the right track and many continue with apologetic arguments. A small group of fanatics believe that they will gain power by killing non-believers. It is as if the world has split into two: Muslims inhabiting one and the rest of the world the other.
The reasons for such attitudes are many, complex and deep-rooted. They can be traced to societal changes and interactions between Muslims and the West over the centuries. The attack on the World Trade Centre was only a tragedy waiting to happen. The event itself and its aftermath had been under preparation for a long time. It is quite possible that even if 9/11 had not occurred, wholesale Islamophobia would have found other excuses.
Between the 7th and 11th centuries, the Muslims had conquered most of the world and developed a diverse and intellectually vibrant civilization, learning from older sources of knowledge, such as Greek and Persian, and initiating and contributing in many fields of science, particularly mathematics and astronomy, philosophy and logic. Many of their treatises were translated into Latin and provided the basis for proliferation of knowledge in the West as it emerged from its “Dark Ages”.
As Muslims lost wars with the Christians between the 11th and 17th centuries, followed by the fall of the Moghul dynasty when the East India Company of Britain conquered the sub-continent in the 17th and 18th centuries and the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in the early 20th century, Muslims faced a continuum of intellectual, spiritual and technological impoverishment. Movements calling for rational interpretation of the Quran were crushed; the unified paradigm of one Ummah was replaced with multiple groupings of sects and nationals and in-fighting became the norm.
Even if 9/11 had not occurred, wholesale Islamophobia would have found other excuses.
The West reduced the influence of the church in public matters and focused on technological development, individual freedom and industrialization while the Muslims fought to survive within their narrow spheres that grew increasingly inward-looking. They resisted new developments, eying them with mistrust and often rejecting them as “western agendas”. Universal moral values, spelled out in the Quran and later elaborated and absorbed by the West were disregarded and relegated to the background as politics and greed for power took over. Muslim governments thrived on corruption and oppression of their people. Education, social justice and freedom of thought were brutally repressed. Muslims equated democratic processes and secularity to irreligiousness and directed hatred towards non-Muslims and women who were considered to be the cause of sexual waywardness.
As Khalid Abu el Fadel puts it, resistance to the West was taken to such extremes that analytical and critical thought and engagement with the rich Islamic heritage was replaced with dogma and a siege mentality that resulted “in a rabid form of patriarchy… engaging in symbolic displays of power that are systematically degrading of women.” Over a long period of time, literalist, anti-women and oppressive interpretations of the Quran and teachings of the Prophet (PBUH) led to crimes against humanity in the name of Islam by marginal groups and defensiveness and apathy by the larger Muslim population.
Much of this decay of intellect and spirit in the Muslim world has also been a result of the destruction wreaked upon Muslim countries by colonial powers. Not only did colonialists rob the colonies of their material wealth and created deep poverty from which they are yet to emerge, they also destroyed Islamic institutions. The democratic principle laid out in the Quran was not allowed to flourish as dictators and despots were aided and abetted through arms and funds and internal strife was supported. The hypocrisy of the West was very evident. It accused Muslim nations of their poor human rights violations record and helped the same governments sow fear and discord among their citizenry. There is clear evidence that groups such as the Al Qaeda, Taliban and Daesh have been created by Western interests. The only real wealth Muslims can lay claim to, on which the West is dependent, is oil. Muslims are still dependent on technology and scientific developments of the West.
The anti-Muslim attitudes are primarily built upon an “us” vs. “them” view. The “us” is all good and civilized; the “them” is crude and lowly, to be subservient at best. According to Fadel, during the earlier centuries of Muslim enlightenment, Islam was viewed by the West with fear, respect and envy. Today, the vilification and alleged bigotry of the Muslims is due to the latter’s socio-political situation which is considered to be at the bottom of the world’s hierarchy.
![]() The writer is a development professional, researcher, translator and columnist with an interest in religion and socio-political issues. She has translated various writings including Dr. Khalid Masud’s seminal biography of the Prophet Mohammed (SWS). She can be reached at nikhat_sattar@yahoo.com |
Cover Story
|
Virus
|
Forum
|
News Buzz
|
Leave a Reply Cancel reply |
Update |
It is not that Muslims don’t have resources. Saudi Arabia spent more than one hundred billion dollars to purchase weapons with which she destroyed poor fellow Arab and Muslim Yemen. It is the same story with Libya, Lebanon and Syria. With the amount they blew away in these destructive wars they could have built at least two, if not more state of the art universities in each of the fifty or so Islamic countries.
When the European powers conquered Muslim lands they ransacked hundreds of their libraries. The books from these are lying in the warehouses of museums in London, Paris, Berlin, Moscow and other places. With only a little bit of effort and a few million dollars, Muslims could have at least copied and translated these. They haven’t even tried to redeem a part of the heritage that they brag about so often.
What hope can there be in the face of such apathy and indifference?